Both the DLR extension to Thamesmead and the Bakerloo line extension to Lewisham represent transformative transport investments for underserved parts of London, but they serve fundamentally different purposes and benefit distinct communities across east and southeast London. The DLR extension focuses on unlocking massive brownfield development at Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead with two new stations enabling 25,000-30,000 homes, while the Bakerloo line extension addresses the historic transport deficit along the Old Kent Road corridor with four new stations serving densely populated existing neighborhoods. The answer to which benefits more areas depends entirely on whether you prioritize enabling new development or improving connectivity for established communities—though both projects deliver exceptional value and ideally both would proceed.
Geographic Coverage Comparison
The Bakerloo line extension covers significantly more ground with approximately 7.5 kilometers of new route compared to the DLR extension’s 4.7 kilometers. This longer route for the Bakerloo line translates to four new stations at Burgess Park, Old Kent Road, New Cross Gate, and Lewisham, compared to just two new DLR stations at Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead. More stations across a longer route naturally serves more distinct neighborhoods and provides more access points for passengers.
The Bakerloo line extension corridor runs through densely populated inner London neighborhoods including Walworth, Camberwell, Peckham, Old Kent Road, New Cross, New Cross Gate, Deptford, and Lewisham. These areas already contain hundreds of thousands of residents who would benefit immediately from improved transport connectivity. The extension addresses existing transport poverty affecting established communities that have been overlooked despite their proximity to central London.
The DLR extension serves areas that are currently much less developed, with Beckton Riverside consisting largely of brownfield industrial sites and Thamesmead being a post-war residential area that has remained isolated due to lack of rail connections. The immediate existing population benefiting from improved connectivity is smaller than for the Bakerloo line, though this changes dramatically once the enabled housing development is complete.
However, geographic coverage measured purely by route length or number of stations doesn’t capture the full picture. The DLR extension’s Thames crossing creates connectivity between two boroughs—Newham and Greenwich—that currently lack direct rail links. This cross-river connection generates network effects and journey opportunities that don’t exist today. The Bakerloo line extension serves communities within Southwark and Lewisham that already have various transport options, albeit inadequate ones, rather than creating entirely new cross-borough connections.
The walking catchment areas around stations provide another comparison metric. Each station typically serves residents within 800 meters to 1 kilometer walking distance—approximately 10-15 minutes walk. The Bakerloo line’s four stations create four distinct catchment circles serving different neighborhoods, while the DLR’s two stations serve smaller total geographic area. However, the DLR stations are positioned specifically to serve major development sites, maximizing the housing and employment enabled per station.
Population Served: Existing vs Future Communities
The most striking difference between the two projects lies in whether they primarily serve existing populations or enable future growth. This distinction fundamentally shapes the projects’ benefits, beneficiaries, and the timeline over which impacts are realized.
The Bakerloo line extension serves areas with substantial existing populations. Old Kent Road and surrounding neighborhoods contain tens of thousands of residents who currently face challenging journeys to central London and other key destinations. These communities exist now, experience transport poverty now, and would benefit immediately from the day the Bakerloo line extension opens. The social justice dimension of addressing existing inequality in transport provision creates powerful arguments for prioritizing this project.
The demographic profile of areas served by the Bakerloo line includes significant proportions of lower-income households, social housing residents, ethnic minority communities, and people who have lived in these neighborhoods for generations. Transport improvements directly benefit these populations by reducing commute times and costs, opening access to employment and education opportunities, and improving quality of life. The extension helps existing residents access opportunities rather than primarily enabling new communities.
The DLR extension serves much smaller existing populations, particularly at Beckton Riverside where current development is minimal. Thamesmead has an established residential community that would benefit from rail connections, but the scale is smaller than the densely populated corridor served by the Bakerloo line. The immediate beneficiaries on opening day number in the thousands rather than tens of thousands.
However, the DLR extension’s primary purpose is enabling future growth. The 25,000-30,000 new homes unlocked by the transport infrastructure would eventually house 60,000-75,000 people assuming average household sizes of 2.5 people. This future population exceeds the existing population that would immediately benefit from the Bakerloo line extension. The question becomes whether we prioritize helping existing communities now or enabling future communities to be created.
The timeline over which benefits are realized differs dramatically. Bakerloo line extension benefits begin immediately upon opening, with existing residents enjoying improved connectivity from day one. DLR extension benefits accrue more gradually as development proceeds in phases over 10-20 years following the transport infrastructure opening. Early residents of Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead benefit immediately, but the full scale of benefits only emerges after decades of continued development.
Housing Delivery Impact
Housing delivery represents one of the most compelling arguments for both extensions, but the scale and nature of housing enabled differs significantly between projects.
The DLR extension unlocks 25,000-30,000 new homes across Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead, representing one of the largest brownfield housing opportunities in London. These homes literally cannot be delivered without the transport infrastructure—developers will not build and buyers will not purchase homes in areas lacking adequate public transport connectivity. The DLR extension is the enabling investment that transforms vacant industrial sites and underutilized land into vibrant residential neighborhoods.
The Bakerloo line extension enables over 25,000 new homes along its route, with at least 10,500 specifically on Old Kent Road. These homes similarly depend on improved transport infrastructure, though the Old Kent Road corridor currently has bus services that Beckton Riverside largely lacks. The Bakerloo line transforms the viability and attractiveness of high-density residential development in areas that are already partially developed rather than completely vacant sites.
Both projects deliver comparable housing numbers—approximately 25,000-30,000 homes each. From a pure housing delivery perspective, neither clearly outperforms the other. Both make essential contributions to addressing London’s housing crisis and meeting ambitious housing targets that cannot be achieved without major transport investments enabling development.
The character and affordability of housing enabled differs between projects. The DLR extension serves completely new neighborhoods built from scratch, offering opportunities to implement modern urban planning principles, sustainability standards, and affordable housing requirements from the outset. New developments at Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead can be designed as integrated, mixed-use, transit-oriented communities rather than retrofitting transport into existing urban fabric.
The Bakerloo line extension serves areas with existing communities, where new housing represents intensification and change to established neighborhoods. This raises both opportunities and challenges—opportunities to enhance existing communities through investment and new amenities, but challenges around gentrification, displacement, and maintaining community character and affordability. The social and political dimensions of change in established neighborhoods differ from building new communities on brownfield sites.
Affordable housing delivery depends on planning policies applied to developments rather than inherent characteristics of the transport projects themselves. Both extensions would be subject to London Plan requirements for affordable housing percentages in new developments, with negotiations between councils and developers determining exact mixes. The extensions enable housing delivery but don’t themselves determine affordability—that depends on policy frameworks and political will.
Employment and Economic Impact
Both extensions generate substantial employment and economic benefits, though through somewhat different mechanisms and benefiting different populations.
The DLR extension creates approximately 10,000 new jobs through development enabled by the transport infrastructure. These jobs include positions in offices, retail, hospitality, healthcare, education, and various services required by new residential and commercial developments. The jobs emerge progressively as development proceeds, with full employment impact realized over 10-20 years.
The Bakerloo line extension similarly creates at least 10,000 new jobs, concentrated particularly along Old Kent Road where major commercial development accompanies residential growth. The employment opportunities span similar sectors—offices, retail, hospitality, and services—though potentially with greater emphasis on creative and cultural industries reflecting the character of areas like Peckham and New Cross.
Employment benefits extend beyond jobs created directly through new development. Both extensions improve access to employment across London for existing residents, opening opportunities that are currently difficult to reach due to lengthy commute times. This employment accessibility benefit helps existing residents of Thamesmead and Old Kent Road areas pursue career advancement and access better-paying opportunities.
The economic impact calculations show comparable magnitudes for both projects. The DLR extension delivers estimated economic benefits of £15.6 billion over its lifetime, far exceeding the construction cost of £700 million to £1.7 billion. The Bakerloo line extension’s economic benefits similarly exceed its £5.2 billion to £8.7 billion cost, though benefit-cost ratios may differ due to the different cost bases.
Productivity gains from reduced travel times contribute significantly to economic benefits for both projects. The 25-35 minutes saved on typical commutes translates to thousands of hours annually per commuter, hours that can be used for productive work, education, family time, or rest—all contributing to economic and social wellbeing. These productivity benefits accrue to both existing residents of areas served by extensions and future residents of newly enabled developments.
The geographic distribution of economic benefits differs between projects. The DLR extension concentrates benefits in Newham and Greenwich, two of London’s most deprived boroughs that have historically received less infrastructure investment than wealthier areas. The Bakerloo line concentrates benefits in Southwark and Lewisham, which face similar challenges around deprivation and underinvestment. Both projects address inequality in economic opportunity and infrastructure provision, though serving different communities.
Cost and Value for Money Analysis
The cost difference between projects is substantial and affects their comparative value propositions and political viability.
The DLR extension costs an estimated £700 million to £1.7 billion for 4.7 kilometers of route and two new stations. At the lower estimate, this represents approximately £149 million per kilometer or £350-850 million per station. At the upper estimate, costs rise to £362 million per kilometer or £850 million per station. These figures place the DLR extension in the mid-range for London underground railway costs.
The Bakerloo line extension costs significantly more at £5.2 billion to £8.7 billion for 7.5 kilometers and four new stations. This represents £693 million to £1.16 billion per kilometer or £1.3 billion to £2.2 billion per station. The substantially higher costs per kilometer and per station reflect the deep-level tube construction required for full-size Underground trains compared to the lighter DLR system that can handle steeper gradients and requires less extensive tunneling infrastructure.
The lower absolute cost of the DLR extension makes it potentially more achievable in a constrained funding environment. Securing £700 million to £1.7 billion represents a significant challenge but is more realistic than finding £5.2 billion to £8.7 billion for the Bakerloo line. Political and fiscal constraints may favor smaller, more affordable projects that still deliver substantial benefits over mega-projects with exceptional benefits but daunting price tags.
Cost per home enabled provides a useful value comparison. The DLR extension at £700 million to £1.7 billion enabling 25,000-30,000 homes represents £23,000 to £68,000 per home. The Bakerloo line at £5.2 billion to £8.7 billion enabling 25,000+ homes represents £208,000 to £348,000 per home. The DLR extension delivers dramatically better cost per home enabled, reflecting the lower construction costs and comparable housing delivery.
However, cost per home ignores the benefits to existing populations. The Bakerloo line serves hundreds of thousands of existing residents from day one, benefits not captured in cost per new home calculations. A more comprehensive cost-benefit analysis considering all impacts—existing residents, new homes, employment, economic productivity, environmental benefits—shows both projects deliver strong value for money despite the cost differences.
The political economy of funding decisions considers not just value for money but also geographic equity, ministerial priorities, and competing demands for constrained budgets. The DLR extension’s lower cost makes it easier to fund but may be seen as less transformative than the Bakerloo line’s comprehensive improvement to a major corridor. Conversely, the Bakerloo line’s exceptional benefits may be undermined by the eye-watering cost in absolute terms even if the benefit-cost ratio is favorable.
Timeline and Deliverability
Project timelines differ significantly, affecting when benefits are realized and the risks of delays or cancellation.
The DLR extension is more advanced in planning, with consultations completed in 2024 and 2025, an outline business case being finalized in autumn 2025, and potential construction commencement in the late 2020s if funding is secured. Opening could occur in the early 2030s, potentially 2032-2033, representing a relatively near-term delivery compared to many major transport projects.
The Bakerloo line extension is at an earlier planning stage despite being discussed for decades. Consultations have been completed but detailed design work and business case finalization remain ongoing. Construction might begin in the early 2030s if funding is secured, with opening around 2040. This longer timeline—potentially 15 years from now—means benefits are delayed compared to the DLR extension.
The longer timeline for the Bakerloo line increases risks of delays, cost escalation, changes in political priorities, and potential cancellation. Projects that extend over decades face greater uncertainty than those deliverable within 5-10 years. The history of transport planning includes numerous ambitious schemes that were designed, consulted upon, and ultimately never built due to changed circumstances or priorities.
The DLR extension’s lighter infrastructure and more modest scope reduce construction risks compared to deep-level tube construction required for the Bakerloo line. Tunnel boring through challenging London ground conditions at depth presents technical challenges that can cause delays and cost overruns. The shallower DLR tunnels and lighter infrastructure requirements create fewer opportunities for major construction problems, improving confidence in timelines and budgets.
Conversely, the Bakerloo line’s connection to the existing network at Elephant and Castle requires complex modifications to a busy operational station, creating interface challenges that don’t exist for the DLR extension branching from a less complex station at Gallions Reach. Managing construction and modifications while maintaining existing passenger services adds complexity and risk to the Bakerloo line project.
Funding approval prospects may favor the DLR extension due to its lower cost, nearer-term delivery, and clearer housing enabling role. Government priorities around housing delivery and brownfield development align closely with the DLR extension’s core purpose. The Bakerloo line’s exceptional benefits must overcome the challenge of a multi-billion pound price tag at a time of constrained public finances.
Network Connectivity and Integration
How each extension integrates with London’s existing transport network affects the value and reach of benefits beyond the immediate corridor served.
The DLR extension connects into the existing DLR network at Gallions Reach, creating seamless onward connections to Canning Town (Jubilee line, London Overground), Royal Victoria (Elizabeth line), Canary Wharf (Jubilee line, Elizabeth line), Bank (Northern, Central, Waterloo & City lines), and Stratford (Central, Jubilee lines, Elizabeth line, London Overground, National Rail). These multiple interchange points create exceptional network connectivity for passengers from Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead.
The cross-river nature of the DLR extension creates entirely new journey possibilities between Newham and Greenwich that don’t currently exist. Passengers from Thamesmead can reach Canning Town in approximately 15 minutes, opening access to destinations across the Jubilee line and beyond. The lack of current cross-river connections makes this new link particularly valuable for journey patterns that are currently extremely difficult.
The Bakerloo line extension connects into the existing Bakerloo line at Elephant and Castle, providing direct services to destinations including Waterloo, Oxford Circus, Regent’s Park, Baker Street, Marylebone, Edgware Road, Paddington, and Queen’s Park. This north-south connectivity is valuable but doesn’t create the same network effects as the DLR’s multiple interchange points with different lines.
Interchange opportunities along the Bakerloo line extension route enhance network integration. New Cross Gate provides connections to London Overground (East London line to Dalston, Highbury & Islington, West Croydon, Crystal Palace) and National Rail services. Lewisham connects to DLR, National Rail, and extensive bus networks. These interchanges create journey flexibility, though the single route nature of the Bakerloo line provides fewer alternative paths than the DLR’s multiple connections.
The DLR’s automated, driverless operation allows high frequencies of trains every 4-5 minutes without the staffing costs of conventional railways. This high frequency creates metro-style capacity and convenience that enhances network value. The Bakerloo line operates with drivers and slightly lower frequencies, though still providing good service levels typical of London Underground lines.
Future network expansion potential differs between projects. The Thamesmead DLR station is being designed to accommodate potential future extensions, with Belvedere mentioned as a possible destination. The Bakerloo line has a proposed further extension beyond Lewisham to Hayes and Beckenham Junction, potentially being built simultaneously with the core extension. Both projects could seed further network growth, though the DLR’s lighter infrastructure makes extensions potentially more affordable.
Environmental and Sustainability Impacts
Both extensions deliver substantial environmental benefits by enabling modal shift from cars and buses to electric rail transport, though the magnitude and nature of impacts differ.
The DLR extension enables transit-oriented development at Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead, creating new neighborhoods designed around public transport from inception. Car-free or car-light residential developments reduce vehicle ownership, minimizing carbon emissions from transport while creating more livable neighborhoods with green space instead of parking. This represents best practice in sustainable urban development.
The brownfield nature of sites served by the DLR extension means development occurs on previously used land rather than consuming green spaces or agricultural land. The 145 hectares transformed from vacant industrial sites and underutilized areas to vibrant neighborhoods represents efficient use of urban land, supporting London’s growth without sprawl into the Green Belt.
The Bakerloo line extension serves areas with existing substantial bus networks, many of which would be modified or reduced following the Underground opening to avoid duplication. Shifting passengers from diesel buses to electric trains reduces emissions and improves air quality, particularly important along Old Kent Road which suffers from poor air quality due to heavy traffic. Health benefits from improved air quality benefit existing communities immediately.
Both projects reduce car dependency and associated emissions by providing high-quality public transport alternatives. Journey time improvements make public transport genuinely competitive with driving, encouraging modal shift among people who currently drive due to inadequate alternatives. The extensions support London’s net-zero carbon ambitions and transport strategy goals of 80% of journeys by walking, cycling, and public transport by 2041.
Construction impacts present environmental challenges for both projects including energy consumption, materials use, waste generation, and local disturbances. However, modern construction practices emphasize sustainability, including using low-carbon materials where possible, recycling construction waste, minimizing energy use, and managing local impacts through noise barriers, dust suppression, and community engagement.
The longer-term environmental benefits of enabling sustainable development and reducing car dependency far outweigh temporary construction impacts. Both projects deliver net positive environmental outcomes over their lifetimes, though quantifying and comparing these benefits requires comprehensive lifecycle assessments considering all impacts from construction through decades of operation.
Political and Community Support
Political backing and community support affect project viability and funding prospects, with differences between the two extensions.
The DLR extension benefits from strong support from the Royal Borough of Greenwich, London Borough of Newham, and major landowners who have funded feasibility studies and actively promoted the project. Public consultations showed 75% support, demonstrating community endorsement. The alignment between transport investment and housing delivery creates political attractiveness spanning multiple policy priorities.
The Bakerloo line extension enjoys overwhelming public support with 89% positive responses to consultations. Southwark Council has allocated over £2.4 million in Community Infrastructure Levy funding specifically to support the project. The “Back the Bakerloo” campaign organized by community groups demonstrates grassroots enthusiasm and advocacy beyond official institutions.
Both projects benefit from Mayor of London Sadiq Khan’s support, though all major infrastructure requires government funding that remains uncertain. The mayor has consistently advocated for both extensions as essential for addressing London’s housing crisis and transport inequalities, but cannot unilaterally fund projects from TfL’s constrained budget.
Government messaging has acknowledged both projects’ benefits without committing funding. The Transport Secretary has indicated recognition of the projects’ importance for housing delivery and economic growth, suggesting openness to funding if business cases are compelling and fiscal conditions allow. However, political commitments remain vague, and both projects compete for limited government infrastructure budgets.
The geographic distribution of political support differs. The DLR extension primarily affects east and southeast London constituencies, while the Bakerloo line serves south and southeast London. The number of MPs whose constituencies benefit, the political parties holding those seats, and relationships between local politicians and government ministers all affect political dynamics around funding decisions.
Which Extension Benefits More Areas: The Verdict
Determining which extension benefits more areas depends entirely on how we define “benefits” and “areas.”
If prioritizing existing populations, the Bakerloo line extension clearly benefits more people immediately. Four stations serving densely populated neighborhoods including Old Kent Road, Camberwell, Peckham, New Cross, and Lewisham provide improved connectivity for hundreds of thousands of existing residents from day one. The social justice dimension of addressing existing transport poverty in established communities creates compelling arguments for the Bakerloo line.
If prioritizing housing delivery and future growth, the DLR extension delivers comparable housing numbers (25,000-30,000 homes) at dramatically lower cost (£700 million to £1.7 billion vs £5.2 billion to £8.7 billion). The cost per home enabled is four to five times better for the DLR, suggesting superior value for money focused specifically on housing objectives. The brownfield development enabled represents sustainable urban growth on previously developed land.
If prioritizing affordability and deliverability, the DLR extension’s lower absolute cost makes it more achievable in a constrained funding environment and deliverable on a shorter timeline (early 2030s vs 2040). Projects that can be funded and built are inherently more valuable than projects that remain perpetually aspirational due to unaffordable price tags or distant timelines.
If prioritizing immediate impact, the Bakerloo line’s service to existing communities delivers benefits the day it opens, while the DLR extension’s benefits accrue gradually as development proceeds over decades. The timeline over which benefits are realized favors the Bakerloo line for immediate impact.
The honest answer is that both extensions are essential, both deliver exceptional value, and both should be funded and built. London’s transport needs cannot be met by choosing between projects—the capital requires sustained investment in multiple major projects simultaneously to address the accumulated underinvestment of recent decades.
Forcing a choice between extensions would be like asking which of your children you love more—the question itself is flawed. The DLR extension and Bakerloo line extension serve different purposes, benefit different communities, and address different aspects of London’s transport and housing challenges. The optimal outcome is funding both projects, allowing them to proceed in parallel or staggered timelines based on planning readiness, funding availability, and construction capacity.
If fiscal constraints genuinely require prioritization, the DLR extension’s lower cost, nearer-term delivery, clearer housing enabling role, and stronger cost-benefit ratio focused on homes delivered might give it a slight edge. However, this conclusion is deeply uncomfortable given the Bakerloo line’s overwhelming public support and immediate benefits for existing communities experiencing transport poverty.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which extension covers more distance?
The Bakerloo line extension covers approximately 7.5 kilometers compared to the DLR extension’s 4.7 kilometers. The longer Bakerloo route creates four new stations compared to two for the DLR, serving more distinct neighborhoods along the corridor.
Which extension costs less?
The DLR extension costs significantly less at £700 million to £1.7 billion compared to the Bakerloo line’s £5.2 billion to £8.7 billion. The lower cost reflects DLR’s lighter infrastructure requirements and shorter route compared to deep-level tube construction for the Bakerloo line.
Which extension enables more housing?
Both extensions enable approximately 25,000-30,000 new homes, making them comparable for housing delivery. The DLR enables this housing at dramatically lower cost per home (£23,000-£68,000) compared to the Bakerloo line (£208,000-£348,000).
Which extension benefits more existing residents?
The Bakerloo line extension benefits more existing residents immediately, serving densely populated neighborhoods including Old Kent Road, Camberwell, Peckham, New Cross, and Lewisham. The DLR serves smaller existing populations at Thamesmead, with most benefits coming as new developments are completed.
Which extension opens sooner?
The DLR extension could open in the early 2030s (potentially 2032-2033) if funding is secured, while the Bakerloo line is projected to open around 2040. The DLR’s nearer-term delivery means benefits are realized sooner.
Which extension creates more jobs?
Both extensions create approximately 10,000 new jobs through development enabled by the transport infrastructure. The job creation is comparable between projects, spanning similar sectors including offices, retail, hospitality, and services.
Which extension is better value for money?
This depends on metrics used. The DLR delivers better cost per home enabled (four to five times lower cost per home). However, comprehensive benefit-cost analysis considering all impacts shows both projects deliver strong overall value exceeding their costs.
Which extension has more public support?
Both enjoy strong public support—89% positive responses for the Bakerloo line and 75% support for the DLR. The higher percentage for the Bakerloo line may reflect serving existing communities directly impacted, while the DLR serves areas with smaller current populations.
Which extension is more likely to get funded?
The DLR extension’s lower absolute cost makes it potentially more achievable in a constrained funding environment. However, neither project has secured funding as of October 2025, and both face uncertainties around government capital investment decisions.
Which extension is more environmentally beneficial?
Both deliver substantial environmental benefits through modal shift from cars to electric rail transport. The DLR enables transit-oriented development on brownfield land, while the Bakerloo improves air quality in areas suffering from traffic pollution. The environmental benefits are comparable.
Can both extensions be built?
Yes, both extensions could and ideally should be built. They serve different purposes, benefit different communities, and address different aspects of London’s transport and housing challenges. The optimal outcome is funding both projects rather than forcing a choice.
Which extension connects better to the existing network?
The DLR extension creates multiple interchange opportunities with the Jubilee line, Elizabeth line, and other services through the existing DLR network. The Bakerloo line provides direct north-south connectivity through central London. Both offer good network integration through different mechanisms.
Which extension is more technically challenging?
The Bakerloo line involves deeper underground construction for full-size tube trains, creating greater technical challenges than the DLR’s lighter infrastructure. The deep-level tunneling required for the Bakerloo line increases construction risks and costs compared to the DLR’s shallower infrastructure.
Which extension addresses inequality better?
Both address geographic inequality in transport provision, serving areas that have been historically underinvested. The Bakerloo line serves existing communities experiencing transport poverty immediately, while the DLR creates new opportunities in areas lacking any rail connections.
Should London prioritize one over the other?
London needs both extensions—they’re not alternatives but complementary investments addressing different needs. Forcing prioritization due to funding constraints is unfortunate, but if necessary, the DLR’s lower cost and better cost per home enabled might give it a slight edge while acknowledging the Bakerloo line’s exceptional benefits for existing communities.
Stay informed with the latest news and in-depth features below.
Big Dumper: The Viral Craze You Need to Know
Jeremiah Smith Stats: The UK Guide to the US Phenom
New DLR Stations Opening Dates 2030: Complete Timeline for Beckton Riverside and Thamesmead
Journey Times from Beckton Riverside to Central London: Complete DLR Extension Travel Guide
Read more on this and other major developments across Britain at:- London City News